FATHERS ADVOCATE
Supporting fathers who are facing unfair treatment in the family court system
Supporting fathers who are facing unfair treatment in the family court system
At Fathers Advocate we encourage men to recognize and harness their potential as strong fathers, regardless of societal undermining. We are committed to eliminating the systems that impede this realization, advocating for a society that values, supports, and celebrates the pivotal role of men as fathers.
Fathers Advocate is not about dividing men against women. Instead, it recognizes and celebrates the distinct and vital roles both parents play in the upbringing of children. We stand for everyone who understands, respects, and supports the role of fatherhood and its profound impact on children.
We see the value in every father and advocate for their rightful place in their children's lives.
We inspire fathers to draw strength from their faith, turning adversity into action. We believe in the transformative power of faith, which fuels our advocacy.
We uphold the principle of family as the heart of our advocacy. We believe that a man, armed with love, becomes the ultimate guardian, a steadfast protector of his loved ones.
We advocate for the sanctity of fatherhood as a man's highest calling, and its power in transforming men into warriors of wisdom and strength, guiding their families through life's darkest trials.
MEET OUR FOUNDER MATT HUTCHINGS TO HEAR HIS STORY
The implementation of Title IV-D funding has been a source of immense distress for families seeking justice in family courts. It seems that Family Court Judges, attorney ad litems, and psychologists are the ones reaping the benefits from this funding. These funds are allocated to states based on the collection of child support, creating no motivation to award custody to the more suitable parent but rather to the one who can afford to pay child support.
This funding mechanism is crucial to understand as it matches every $3 collected in child support with $2 in Title IV-D funding. Unfortunately, these funds, instead of being used to enforce the visitation rights of the non-custodial parent, are being diverted to unspecified areas within the State, with no accountability for their expenditure.
This lack of transparency and accountability is alarming, especially when there are widespread reports across the United States of CPS seizing children and placing them for adoption to avail incentive funds ranging between $4,000 to $8,000 per child.
The implications of this are profound and far-reaching. Regardless of the amount spent on legal representation or the competence of your attorney, the underlying issue remains the influx of federal funding to States, not for the welfare of the children, but as a revenue stream.
The denial of due process and the violation of the civil rights of families and children are escalating issues. Without stringent accountability for the actions of the Family Court and transparency in financial dealings, the situation is the situation is escalating.
To date, 4,673,125 letters addressing this issue have been dispatched to the U.S. House and Senate and the President, emphasizing the urgency and the widespread concern regarding this matter.
Men can be victims. When men are victims, it is harder for them to seek help and receive it when they do ask. This is not to diminish the perspective of female survivors. This is to educate about male survivors, who are much less likely to come forward or seek help.
Here are the facts:
Research shows that threats to make false accusations are common in situations where women perpetrate violence against men. 73% of men who experienced female-perpetrated violence reported that their partner threatened to make false accusations versus less than 3% of males in the general population. Among men who experience female-perpetrated violence, 56% said their female partners actually did make false accusations that he physically or sexually abused her, compared to less than one percent in the general population.
False accusations are a form of domestic violence, another tool in an abuser’s “toolbox.” They are a way for abusers to further manipulate, control, and maintain power over their partners.
The studies show that women are significantly more likely to use false accusations of domestic violence against their male partners than the other way around.
It is likely that a female perpetrator is able to engage in these behaviors because of existing widespread misconceptions in both the public and legal sector that domestic violence is exclusively something that men do to women.
There are many accounts in the scholarly literature from men who spent much money, time, and other resources to prove their innocence in a court of law because of restraining orders being filed against them under false accusations of abuse; men who said the police assumed the men were at fault; and men whose wives used domestic violence service agencies to further manipulate the men (e.g., by telling the services they were the victims and then using that against him in further legal battles).
Employees of relevant non‐governmental (e.g., domestic violence agencies) and governmental (e.g., family courts) agencies often hold stereotypes that men are always the perpetrators of domestic violence and that women are always the victims, making it difficult for men to seek services.
The studies suggest that false accusations can have severe consequences for the victim’s physical and mental health, potentially leading to depression, post-traumatic stress symptoms, and poor physical health.
They can have other severe consequences as well, such as the victim being arrested for domestic violence, losing custody of their children, losing their job and reputation, and losing time and money as they fight these legal battles for years on end.
(This information is from three separate studies about male victims and criminal justice response, legal and administrative aggression, and the health of male victims.)
Men’s experiences with domestic violence are not that different from women who experience it in terms of mental health, physical, and even sexual abuse.
The key difference is around seeking help. Men are less likely to seek help on a broad range of mental and physical health issues.
Coupled with society viewing domestic violence as a women’s issue, it is hard for men to identify what’s happening to them as domestic violence. They often think “my partner is mentally ill,” not “I need help.”
She is an associate professor in the Department of Social Work, College of Health and Human Services, at George Mason University. She is one of the world’s leading experts on male victims of domestic violence and false allegations against them. Hines’ expertise includes the causes, consequences, and prevention of family violence and sexual assault, with a particular focus on under-recognized victims of violence. As the former director of the Massachusetts Family Impact Seminars, she also has a specialization in translating university-based research for policymakers.
Dr. Hines is the author of over 70 peer-reviewed articles and two books on issues of family violence, one of which – Family Violence in the United States – was recently released by Sage in its third edition. She and her colleagues are currently working on an international handbook entitled, Handbook of Men’s Victimisation in Intimate Relationships, currently under contract with Taylor and Francis. She has spoken about her work in front of various audiences, including state coalitions against domestic violence, the Massachusetts State legislature, the White House domestic policy staff, staff of the Senate Judiciary Committee, and Canadian Parliament.
Matt Hutchings
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.